10 Things Employment Recruiters Need to Say
October 28th, 2010By Patty Hampton, CSP, Managing Director Staffing Services/Executive Search Consultant
After reading 10 Things Employment Recruiters Won’t Say by Will Swarts, I want to set the record straight on a few points from my perspective and how I run a staffing firm. I appreciate Swarts calling out staffing firms on their deficiencies, but he’s wrong on a few points. My background on this topic is thus; I have been a candidate with a staffing firm and unemployed in my professional career. I also have managed the staffing firm, Nonprofit Staffing Solutions, for almost a decade.
I want to begin by stating that not all agencies are the same. I personally do not use the term headhunter because it has evolved into an ugly and negative connotation. I prefer to use the term staffing consultant. Also, I was disappointed by the author’s choice of facts, but then we do have to sell and increase readership by any means necessary.
There is no such thing as a “better” way to find a job in today’s market. I believe all job seekers should have a staffing consultant working on their behalf while looking for opportunities on their own. Staffing consultants not only serve as another pair of ears and eyes for a job seeker, but are a viable resource that can also skill market, secure interviews and create bridges where none may have existed.
Swarts did miss a few statistics in his opening point (There are better ways to find a job). According to the American Staffing Association, U.S. staffing companies employ more than two million temporary and contract employees each day—and 11 million over the course of a year. Also, if you look into the stats provided by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, you will also find that the staffing industry will add more new jobs in the next six years than any other industry. So, if I were a job seeker, I would have to validate my own experiences with a staffing firm, before I take his advice. Staffing agencies are not only putting people back to work and serving as a bridge to permanent employment, but we have proven on a daily basis that we are a viable employment resource now and in the future.
My heart goes out to the media advertising executive that Swarts mentioned in his second point (We don’t work for you). Again, not all agencies are the same. I can tell you that when a candidate is fully vetted, salary should never be treated as an afterthought. Candidates deserve to know up-front the relationship a staffing firm has with a client and the negotiable salary range for a position if they were retained or conducting a contingency search.
Swarts also wrote about how recruiters work for the hiring company and their allegiance lies with the client and not with the candidate. Again, not all agencies are the same. Most staffing consultants look for a win-win solution for the client and the candidate. This is what I term as a balanced approach. Meeting the client’s expectations and facilitating a negotiated salary that both candidate and client can work with not only makes sense, it is a matter of integrity and client loyalty. When you are in compensation discussions with the client at the kickoff of the hiring process most staffing consultants that I know do not use the “client-centered” approach. This business is about building and leveraging relationships. The candidate and the client experience will be different, but in the end, the staffing consultant’s main goal should always be focused on the integrity of the process and never compromising one deal for another.
I tend to agree with Swarts’s third point (Until a year ago, I was a car salesman) with the exception of one caveat. Through a little research he will find that today quite a few programs require staffing and HR professionals to purchase coursework materials prior to being qualified to take the exam for a certification designation. In the staffing world, we take certifications seriously. Certifications are about dealing with the federal and state laws that impact a firms business, protecting rights of candidates, employees and providing guidance to clients on co-employment obligations and responsibilities. A staffing firm that cares deeply about its clients and the candidates that are recommended to those clients is engaging in best practices to set themselves apart. Certification is one way to accomplish this separation.
After calling a few people, I can confirm that his fourth point (The job we advertised may not exist) still exists today with some agencies and this truly saddens me. I see no point for this madness. Like he said, this is misleading and hurts anyone engaged in a career search that is desperately trying to secure an opportunity.
Swarts’s fifth point (We already know quite a bit about you) actually scares me! My goodness, yes, there’s probably quite a few agencies engaged in this type of recruiting and pre-employment practice. My best advice – BEWARE. There are a variety of state laws concerning what information can be used during the pre-employment process. I’ve witnessed hiring managers using Google and Facebook, as well as other social media sites, to investigate applicants. There is already some case law that one can refer to, but I believe it is just a matter of time before we see federal employment laws about this practice.
I have a few words of caution for Swarts when he quotes independent career consultants in this sixth point (Our jobs aren’t so hot either), validate what you write before it goes to print. There are a few small niche market staffing firms that actually don’t have to compete with the bigger, national and international firms. Being the managing director of a small staffing firm myself, I can tell you that sometimes great things including career opportunities come in small packages! Our niche market is the nonprofit sector. When you have a portfolio of business that can make a difference in a big world, suddenly you don’t look or feel so small. Plus, 2010 is turning out to be the biggest year in our firm’s history.
Concerning point seven (You’re at the mercy of a computer), there are still some staffing consultants that are old school and know how to source and network in the Internet age. Our firm uses a variety of methods; however our practice is one where we network 80 percent of the time and source 20 percent via resume boards. Staffing firms can no longer afford to identify and vet the same candidates that clients can find on their own. Again, not all staffing firms are the same and I will validate that we DO read cover letters and resumes. This may be a dying art for some, but not for us. As a staffing consultant, I’ve learned alot about a candidate in a cover letter before I decide to schedule a phone screen. We also counsel our candidates about writing good cover letters. We teach how to pepper a resume with key words to make it standout.
The “temp-to-hire” carrot as Swarts puts it is NOT rotten (point eight). It is a bridge to permanent employment for many of our candidates. I was a temp-to-hire employee through a large staffing firm back in my corporate days. It was the best experience I could have imagined and one that I still recall today. I also picked up a few tips and built a relationship with my then staffing consultant. I see his point, but I believe it is just a matter of some organizations reluctance to add permanent staff to their payroll given the economic environment. The temp-to-hire approach is positive rather than the negative picture that has been painted in the article.
As for point number nine (If you have a job, I could get you fired), I agree – not all recruiters are careful. As a staffing consultant, you have to obtain permission to share the resume of a candidate with another organization. If staffing firms have a standard practice not to engage in this type of recruiting/sourcing activity, then hooray for them. Skill marketing a candidate or pulling resumes down from LinkedIn without express permission from a candidate is a practice I like to call “recruiters gone wild.” Again, not all firms are the same, and it should be a general practice for all firms to fully vet a candidate which includes an in-person interview before their background is shared.
Swarts’s number ten (If I’m in Virginia, I probably won’t help you find a job in Nebraska) is correct. I can recall every friendly referral I’ve received or given to colleagues in other staffing firms or organizations. When staffing firms are passionate about impacting the life of another person, only then will we see more and more friendly referrals. I love candidate and client referrals.
At the end of the day when your conscious is clear and your integrity is in tact, for some of us, it’s about the lives you’ve touched and the relationships you’ve built that we remember. Swarts’s article is a great buyer beware piece, but for the thousands of jobs our firm fills the work we do is often greatly appreciated by our clients and our temporary workers.
